The Parent You Meant to Be

Posted on by

Written by Alyssa Strickland

Somewhere before the child arrives, most of us create a parent in our imagination. The figure is patient, present, curious about everything, and somehow capable of listening carefully to stories that have no beginning or end. This parent knows when to intervene and when to let the moment unfold, and remains composed through the ordinary chaos of family life. We imagine this person before we know what it means to become them, carrying the idea of this future self almost like a promise. Then the child arrives, and the imagined parent has to make room for the actual one: tired, distracted, occasionally impatient, sometimes bored by the repetition of the very life they love. The distance between those two people can feel like failure, but it may be something else entirely—the beginning of understanding what parenting actually asks of us.

The Parent You Pictured

The imagined parent is a kind of performance written in advance. There is an audience, although no one has bought a ticket yet: perhaps the child we have not met, perhaps our own parents, our friends, or the younger version of ourselves who once decided what kind of mother or father we would become. We carry these ideas into parenthood as if they were instructions, expecting that love and preparation will somehow make the transition recognizable. But actual parenting is not performed in advance. It happens in real time, under conditions no one can completely prepare for, in kitchens and bedrooms, in cars and pediatrician’s offices, during arguments and celebrations, in the middle of the night and at six in the morning. It is repetitive, physical, emotional work performed with incomplete information, and there is no rehearsal for the particular child who eventually stands in front of you.

Much of the culture surrounding parenting is devoted to closing the distance between the parent we imagined and the parent we became. It offers systems, routines, philosophies and, often, reassurance. There is value in reassurance, particularly when someone is frightened by how unfamiliar their own life suddenly feels, but there is also value in looking directly at the distance itself. Sometimes the more honest question is not, How do I become the parent I thought I would be? but Who am I becoming now? That question leaves room for the strange, unfinished quality of parenthood—the possibility that becoming a parent is not the fulfillment of an identity but the beginning of another kind of transformation.

A Name for the Shift

Part of what makes early parenthood so destabilizing is that the change is deeper than behavior. It can feel like an alteration of identity itself, as though the architecture of a person’s inner life has been rearranged while they are still expected to perform all of its ordinary functions. There is a word for this: matrescence. The term was coined in 1973 by medical anthropologist Dana Raphael and later developed into a broader clinical framework by Columbia University researcher Aurélie Athan. The reproductive psychiatrist Alexandra Sacks has written about the concept in Psychology Today, describing matrescence as a developmental transition involving the body, mind and hormones, with a scale comparable in some ways to adolescence.

That comparison matters because adolescence is understood as a period in which a person changes physically, psychologically and socially, often without knowing exactly who they will be on the other side. We have language for that transformation, even when we do not always experience it gracefully. Parenthood deserves some of the same generosity. Sacks has also pointed to the number of people who arrive in clinical settings wondering whether what they are experiencing is postpartum depression when, in some cases, they may be experiencing the enormous psychological reorganization that accompanies becoming a parent. These experiences are not interchangeable, and serious symptoms should not be dismissed, but neither should every difficult emotion be understood automatically as evidence that something has gone wrong. Sometimes a person is simply becoming someone new, and the unfamiliarity of that process can be frightening without necessarily being pathological.

Naming that possibility does not make the experience less difficult. It changes the location of the shame. Instead of asking what is wrong with me, a person can begin asking what is happening to me, what has changed, and what kind of support might allow me to move through it. There is something quietly liberating about having a word for an experience that previously existed only as a collection of contradictory feelings. The name does not solve the transition; it simply gives the person moving through it somewhere to stand.

The Exhaustion Beneath the Love

The most socially acceptable version of parental exhaustion is tiredness. We understand the jokes about sleepless nights and interrupted meals, the parent who says they haven’t slept properly in years, the sense that exhaustion is simply the admission price for loving someone this much. What is harder to discuss is what prolonged exhaustion can do to a person’s relationship with the role itself. There is a difference between being tired because you have been awake all night and becoming so depleted that the emotional experience of parenting begins to change. The latter can be difficult to admit because it can feel dangerously close to admitting that love itself has become complicated.

A large multi-country study led by Isabelle Roskam, published in Affective Science, describes parental burnout through several dimensions: overwhelming parenting-related exhaustion, emotional distancing from one’s children, and a loss of pleasure and effectiveness in the role, accompanied by a sense that the parent has become different from the person they once were. The distinction between parental burnout and ordinary occupational burnout is particularly important. A person can leave a job, take a vacation, change careers, take medical leave or simply close the laptop at the end of the day. Parenthood does not offer the same clean boundary. There is no clocking out of the role, and the inability to step away can make exhaustion feel less like an episode and more like a condition of existence.

The research is difficult precisely because it asks us to consider feelings that parents are often taught to keep private. Some parents experience profound ambivalence. Some become emotionally numb. Some wonder what their lives would look like if they had made different choices. A study of Polish parents, published in PLoS ONE, found a meaningful minority who reported that, if given the choice again, they would not choose to have children. That finding does not invalidate parenthood; it complicates our understanding of it. Love and regret can occupy the same human life, as can devotion and boredom, gratitude and resentment, tenderness and the desire to be alone. None of those feelings automatically determines the quality of a parent or the depth of a parent’s love. They are part of the emotional territory created when one person’s life becomes permanently entangled with another’s, and perhaps parents need less instruction in how to eliminate those contradictions than permission to understand them.

Continue reading →

John Coltrane: The Sound of Becoming

Posted on by

Written By Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

On the book, Coltrane: The Definitive Visual Celebration of the Legend, edited by Ravi Coltrane

An Introduction by John Mayer

What Remains

I have spent a good part of my life thinking about what it means for a musician to leave something behind. Not just records, not just songs, not just the recognizable evidence of a career, but something that remains in other musicians long after the original sound has stopped. You hear it in the way someone phrases a note, in the way they leave space, in the moment they decide not to play what you expected them to play. You can trace influence through technique, but that is usually the least interesting part of it. The deeper inheritance is harder to name. It is the feeling that someone who lived before you somehow gave you permission to become more fully yourself.

Coltrane: The Definitive Visual Celebration of the Legend seems, at first, like a statement about someone whose story has already been decided. But Coltrane’s story does not feel decided to me. It feels interrupted. He died in 1967 at forty years old, and there is something almost impossible about placing that fact beside the enormous amount of music he had already made. There should have been another decade, then another, and another after that. There should have been the older Coltrane, the man looking back on the young man who made Blue Train, the musician explaining what he had been hearing when he made Ascension, the elder statesman answering questions about everything that had happened since A Love Supreme. We never got that version of him. Instead, we have the work, the people who knew him, the people who loved him, and now this book, assembled by his son.

Ravi Coltrane’s role changes everything.

There is a difference between being asked to remember a great musician and being asked to remember your father. Ravi was born into a story that the rest of the world already considered complete. John Coltrane was already becoming John Coltrane in the historical imagination by the time Ravi was old enough to know what his father’s name meant. The public had its version of him: the serious face, the saxophone, the genius, the spiritual seeker, the innovator. Ravi inherited something much more complicated. He inherited the private person underneath all those descriptions, as well as the responsibility of watching that private person become one of the most consequential musicians of the twentieth century. -JM

The Photograph and the Sound

John Coltrane has been photographed so many times that certain images have become almost indistinguishable from the music itself. We know the lowered head, the saxophone held close to the body, the concentrated face, the posture of a person apparently listening to something beyond the room. These images have helped create the Coltrane we carry in our minds, but they have also made it easy to forget that the person inside those photographs was not born a legend. He was a working musician who practiced, traveled, collaborated, loved, struggled, raised a family, entered studios, waited for cues, and spent his life trying to understand what sound could become. Coltrane: The Definitive Visual Celebration of the Legend is valuable precisely because it brings some of that physical reality back into view. Edited by Ravi Coltrane, the volume gathers more than two hundred photographs and contributions from musicians, artists, writers, and cultural figures who encountered Coltrane’s music as something more than an important chapter in jazz history. 

The book arrives at an unusual point in time because 2026 marks the centennial of Coltrane’s birth. The official Coltrane Estate has organized a year-long Coltrane 100 celebration that includes archival releases, performances, recordings, and projects designed to reconsider the breadth of his influence. The photographic book belongs naturally inside that larger reconsideration because it does not attempt to settle Coltrane’s meaning so much as reopen the archive around him. It places the famous photographs beside images that allow us to imagine the circumstances in which the music actually happened. There are candid photographs from the recording of Blue Train, outtakes from the Ascension album-cover session, and a remarkable backstage glimpse of John and Alice Coltrane before their first performance together. These are not simply additional illustrations for a familiar story; they are pieces of evidence that make the familiar story feel less finished. 

That distinction matters because the word “legend” can sometimes push an artist too far away from us. A legend is easier to admire than a person, because a legend has already been resolved by history. Coltrane was never resolved in his own lifetime, and his music becomes less interesting when we pretend that it was. His career was a continuous movement away from whatever he had just learned, and the photographs give us a way to see that movement rather than simply celebrating its destination. The young musician in a studio, the husband beside Alice, the father with his family, and the performer absorbed in the instrument all belong to the same life. The visual record reminds us that the extraordinary came out of the ordinary conditions of human existence. 

The Son Looking at the Father

Ravi Coltrane’s presence changes the emotional temperature of the book. He is not approaching this archive only as a musician, historian, or curator, but as the son of a man who died when Ravi was still an infant. He has subsequently spent his life as a saxophonist, composer, bandleader, and custodian of the Coltrane family legacy, including efforts to preserve the John Coltrane Home and to oversee important reissues of his parents’ recordings. That makes the act of looking at these photographs fundamentally different from the way an outside biographer might look at them. A historian sees evidence, while a son can also see absence, resemblance, family, and the strange fact that a private face eventually became public property. Ravi Coltrane is therefore working within a space where cultural history and personal inheritance cannot be separated. 

This is particularly moving when the photographs allow John Coltrane to appear relaxed. The serious Coltrane is everywhere in the cultural imagination, but photographs of him smiling, laughing, or simply existing away from the stage have a different force. JazzTimes notes that the book’s intimate images allow us to see aspects of Coltrane that are less familiar, including photographs connected to Alice and their children. The effect is not to make Coltrane less profound, but to give his profundity a human scale. It becomes possible to imagine the person between the performances rather than only the performer during them. Sometimes a smile can tell us more about a life than another photograph of a genius looking intensely into the middle distance. 

There is something quietly radical about allowing a great artist to remain ordinary for a moment. We are accustomed to biographies that build toward achievement, as though every childhood experience, every relationship, and every hardship existed only to produce the masterpiece that came later. Coltrane’s life was certainly shaped by extraordinary musical ambition, but the photographs resist the idea that his humanity was merely preparation for his greatness. They show a man among other people, and that matters because music is never created in isolation even when we remember it that way. Behind every canonical recording are rooms, conversations, friendships, marriages, arguments, teachers, collaborators, instruments, bodies, and time. The archive gives some of those things back to us.

Alice and John

The photographs of John and Alice Coltrane may be among the most meaningful images in the entire volume because their relationship represents a meeting of two artistic and spiritual lives that would continue to reverberate after John’s death. Alice was not merely the woman beside an important musician; she was herself a major composer, pianist, harpist, spiritual seeker, and bandleader whose later work expanded the possibilities of jazz in another direction. Her recollections of John describe a relationship grounded in music, conversation, spirituality, and intimacy, including a memory of him following her backstage with his horn and playing to her as a form of tenderness. 

The new book’s photograph of the couple backstage before their first performance together therefore carries more than historical value. It shows us the beginning of a musical and personal dialogue whose consequences extended well beyond John’s lifetime.

John Coltrane’s spirituality is often discussed as though it were a separate category from his music, but the two became increasingly inseparable. After his recovery from addiction in 1957, he experienced what he understood as a profound spiritual awakening, and his subsequent work increasingly treated music as a form of devotion and inquiry. A Love Supreme is perhaps the clearest expression of that impulse, but the spiritual trajectory continues through Meditations, Om, Ascension, and the increasingly expansive recordings of his final years. Alice later described his purpose in deeply religious terms, saying that he had dedicated his life and musical endeavors to God. For Coltrane, then, the instrument was not simply a means of expression; it was one of the places where a life could be examined. 

This is one reason photographs of Coltrane can feel almost devotional even when they depict nothing explicitly religious. The face becomes an instrument of concentration, and concentration becomes a kind of spiritual posture. Yet there is a danger in turning that posture into sainthood because sainthood can erase struggle. Coltrane’s spiritual life was not a clean ascent from darkness into enlightenment; it was a continuous practice of trying to become more attentive, more disciplined, and more truthful. His music retains the sound of that effort. The photographs do too, particularly when they show the musician working rather than simply posing.

The Discipline Inside the Freedom

Coltrane is frequently described as a musician of freedom, but freedom is an incomplete description of what he achieved. His most radical music was built upon an extraordinary accumulation of discipline, study, memory, and technique. John Szwed’s writing on A Love Supreme and Coltrane’s later work emphasizes that the apparent freedom of his music emerged from years of patient study and practice rather than from an abandonment of structure. Amiri Baraka made a related point in his appreciation of Coltrane, describing him as both rooted in tradition and relentlessly searching for new means of expression. The contradiction is essential: Coltrane’s freedom was not the absence of form but the ability to move through form without allowing it to become a prison. 

That idea becomes especially vivid when we think about Giant Steps. The record is often treated as a technical monument, and understandably so, because its harmonic architecture remains a challenge to musicians decades later. But listening to it only as a display of technical brilliance misses something more important. The music sounds like a mind moving faster than the structure can contain it. The chords become a landscape that Coltrane does not simply navigate but interrogates. What matters is not that he conquered the changes, but that he used mastery as a reason to ask what might exist beyond them.

The same principle eventually leads toward Ascension. By 1965 and 1966, Coltrane was expanding the quartet into larger, more volatile forms, bringing together musicians whose individual voices could create something closer to a collective weather system than a conventional jazz ensemble. Ascension can sound overwhelming because it is supposed to challenge the listener’s expectation that improvisation must always be organized around the individual soloist. Szwed points out that Coltrane’s late music was not simply an escape from earlier forms but an extension of his long engagement with modes, drones, repetition, and collective sound. The outtakes from Chuck Stewart’s Ascension photographs are therefore especially evocative because they belong to the visual record of a musician in the middle of a transformation. 

Continue reading →

Dedicated to You: Branford Marsalis and Dianne Reeves return to the intimate world of John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman

Posted on by

Written by Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

Branford Marsalis and Dianne Reeves return to the intimate world of John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman, finding new freedom in songs that have already lived several lifetimes.

Some albums arrive carrying history; some albums are mysterious, others austere and emotive. Yet, there are times when an anniversary of an era emerges, like a centennial that brings a long time coming-esque project into fruition.

Dedicated to You, the forthcoming collaboration between Branford Marsalis, Dianne Reeves, and the Branford Marsalis Quartet was created in celebration of John Coltrane’s centennial, the album revisits the six standards associated with Coltrane’s landmark 1963 collaboration with Johnny Hartman while expanding the conversation through instrumental performances drawn from Coltrane’s canon. Rather than attempting to reproduce the sound of that celebrated Impulse! recording, Marsalis and Reeves approach its repertoire as living music—material that can still breathe, shift, and reveal something unexpected. Released by Blue Note Records on September 18, 2026, Dedicated to You arrives not simply as a tribute to Coltrane, but as a meditation on what happens when musicians return to songs whose emotional lives have already been shaped by generations of listeners.

The decision to begin with John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman is central to understanding Dedicated to You. When Marsalis was approached about participating in the centennial celebrations, he immediately liked the idea but wanted to take what he called “a road less travelled.” Instead of reaching for the recordings most commonly associated with Coltrane’s radicalism, he was drawn toward an album built almost entirely on standards—songs whose melodies and lyrics were already deeply familiar to American listeners. That choice is more daring than it initially appears. A standard leaves nowhere to hide: the melody is known, the lyric is known, and the emotional architecture has been carried by other singers and musicians before you. The question becomes not whether you can make the song different, but whether you can make someone hear what was already there.

The ballad is perhaps the most unforgiving form of that challenge. At a slower tempo, there is nowhere for a musician to outrun an uncertain phrase or disguise an emotional choice beneath velocity. Every breath becomes audible; every pause acquires weight. On Dedicated to You, that spaciousness allows Reeves and Marsalis to explore the qualities that made the Coltrane/Hartman recording so enduring: intimacy, patience, tonal beauty, and an almost conversational relationship between voice and saxophone. The songs are not treated as empty vessels waiting for virtuosity to fill them. They arrive already complete, and the musicians’ task is to discover where they can enter without disturbing the song’s essential character. In that sense, restraint becomes not an absence of invention but one of its most sophisticated forms.

The six vocal standards at the heart of Dedicated to You—“Autumn Serenade,” “Dedicated to You,” “You Are Too Beautiful,” “Lush Life,” “My One and Only Love,” and “They Say It’s Wonderful”—also reveal how expansive the idea of a “standard” can be. These songs do not all occupy the same emotional world. “Autumn Serenade” carries the delicacy of seasonal memory, while “Lush Life” moves toward something darker and more psychologically complicated, its lyric tracing the aftermath of romantic disillusionment. “My One and Only Love” is almost unbearably direct in its declaration of devotion, while “You Are Too Beautiful” depends on a more fragile balance between admiration and vulnerability. Taken together, the songs create an emotional arc that is more complicated than the word “standards” suggests. They are songs about desire, memory, loneliness, devotion, regret, and the difficulty of saying what we mean when the stakes are intimate.

“Lush Life,” in particular, demonstrates why these songs continue to invite reinterpretation. Billy Strayhorn’s composition is often described as a standard, but its emotional terrain is anything but standardized. Its sophisticated harmonic language and long, conversational lyric require a singer to negotiate between elegance and exhaustion, between the surface beauty of the arrangement and the darker experience underneath it. Reeves has spent a career developing precisely that kind of interpretive intelligence—the ability to allow a lyric to remain sophisticated without making it emotionally distant. In a project centered on Coltrane, it is significant that the most radical gestures may come from simply allowing a lyric its full weight. The song does not need to be reinvented to become contemporary; it needs to be heard honestly.

The same is true of “My One and Only Love,” a song whose emotional directness could easily become sentimental in less careful hands. Its power depends on vulnerability, but vulnerability in jazz is rarely achieved by simply increasing the emotional volume. It comes through phrasing, breath, timing, and the willingness to leave a little space around a declaration. This is where Reeves’ philosophy, shaped in part by her teenage work with Clark Terry, becomes especially relevant. Terry taught her to understand what a song needs—sometimes embellishment, sometimes space, sometimes nothing at all. That lesson is particularly valuable with ballads because the temptation to overstate them is always present. Reeves instead approaches the material as a storyteller, allowing the emotional meaning to emerge gradually rather than insisting upon it.

Dedicated to You, the song that gives the album its title, carries its own significance within this collection. The title can be heard as a direct gesture toward Coltrane, but the song itself complicates that dedication by making the language personal. A dedication is an act of giving something to another person, and that idea resonates throughout an album built on musical inheritance. Hartman once gave these songs his voice; Coltrane gave them another dimension through his playing; Reeves and Marsalis now receive that inheritance and return it in another form. The title therefore works on several levels at once—an album title, a song, and a statement about the nature of artistic memory. Music passes from one person to another, and each act of passing changes it slightly.

Continue reading →

John Mayer’s Early Emergence as a Songwriter and Guitarist From Inside Wants Out to Any Given Thursday

Posted on by

By Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

The freshness, and stable vulnerability of John Mayer before the machinery of John Mayer had fully assembled itself is not only enlightening when it comes to his foundational absorption of music, film, art, love and time; it reveals a maturity within his youth. His long-winds are there, like they have always have and will likely always be, but they are doused in the discovery in memory and nostalgia more his charming declarative understanding of the development of his manhood.

Before the magazines, the television appearances, the Grammys, and the mythology of the guitar, there was a young musician in Atlanta making songs that sounded as though they had been left open on a desk overnight. Inside Wants Out, released independently in September 1999, is not merely an early recording; it is evidence of a person still negotiating the distance between private musical instinct and public performance. Four of its songs would later be reworked for Room for Squares, but the distinction between those records is more emotional than simply sonic. The later album knows what a listener is supposed to hear, while Inside Wants Out often sounds as though it is discovering the listener as it plays. That difference becomes even more revealing when placed beside Any Given Thursday, recorded at Birmingham, Alabama’s Oak Mountain Amphitheatre on September 12, 2002, and released on February 11, 2003. 

The young Mayer had already lived several musical lives before the public met him as the affable songwriter of “No Such Thing.” After graduating from high school in 1995, he worked at a gas station and played blues clubs before enrolling at Berklee College of Music in Boston, where he remained for two semesters. He then moved to Atlanta with Clay Cook, and the city became the setting for a more informal education: clubs, open mics, records, other musicians, and the peculiar education of trying to make a living before anyone had decided you were worth listening to. Mayer had become fascinated with Stevie Ray Vaughan as a teenager after hearing a cassette of Vaughan’s music, at a moment when many of his peers were absorbed in alternative rock. That contradiction—an emerging songwriter with a pop sensibility carrying the vocabulary of electric blues—would remain one of the most important tensions in his career. It is also one reason Inside Wants Out deserves to be heard as something more complicated than a rough draft of Room for Squares.

Inside Wants Out has the intimacy of a musician who has not yet learned to disguise the room in which the song was made. The recordings are predominantly acoustic, with Mayer’s voice and guitar occupying the center without the protective architecture that a major-label production can provide. Even the weaknesses are informative: the closeness of the recording makes breaths, hesitations, changes in vocal pressure, and the physical mechanics of guitar playing part of the composition. “No Such Thing,” “Back to You,” “My Stupid Mouth,” and “Neon” would eventually receive more polished treatments on Room for Squares, but their earlier forms reveal how much of Mayer’s appeal was already present before the industry had decided how to package it. There is a young man trying to sound casual while taking songwriting very seriously, which is a recognizable emotional state for anyone who has ever been twenty-something and terrified of becoming ordinary. The songs are concerned with adulthood, romantic uncertainty, self-consciousness, and the strange feeling of watching your own life become a story before you understand its plot. 

The title itself feels almost like a miniature manifesto. Inside Wants Out describes the impulse behind a great deal of singer-songwriter music: the private thing becomes unbearable if it remains private. Mayer was not simply writing songs; he was developing a mechanism for externalizing interior experience, and the songs often turn ordinary details into emotional evidence. “Victoria” observes the collapse of a relationship through small movements rather than grand declarations, while “Comfortable” has the particular ache of remembering an intimacy that no longer exists in the same form. “Love Soon” is younger and less settled, almost embarrassed by its own hopefulness, whereas “Quiet” seems to understand that sometimes emotional intensity arrives through restraint. These are not necessarily the most sophisticated songs Mayer would ever write, but they possess the quality that makes early work valuable: they show an artist discovering which parts of himself are transferable into sound.

There is also something important about where these songs came from. Mayer’s early career coincided with a brief, strange period in which the internet could function as an alternative musical infrastructure rather than simply another branch of the entertainment industry. He built a local following through the Atlanta club circuit, particularly at Eddie’s Attic, while his early recordings circulated independently before his eventual relationship with Aware Records and Columbia. That culture of circulation mattered because it allowed the music to travel before a conventional marketing apparatus had completely defined its meaning. An unknown singer-songwriter could move from a coffeehouse to a website to a burned CD to a college campus without necessarily passing through the gatekeeping rituals of radio first. In retrospect, Mayer’s rise can look inevitable, but the archive shows something much messier: a musician gradually becoming legible to an audience that was already looking for him. 

Continue reading →

The Intelligence of Looking: Zadie Smith and Namwali Serpell

Posted on by

Written By: Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

A writer’s life is made not only from the books she publishes but from the things she cannot stop noticing—the gestures that become characters, the histories that refuse to stay buried, the sentences of other writers that follow her for decades, the private questions that become public art, and the persistent feeling that the world, despite everything we think we know about it, remains stranger than our explanations for it.

Zadie Smith and Namwali Serpell have built their literary lives inside that strangeness, though they approach it from different directions and with markedly different formal instincts, and what makes their work so compelling together is not that they offer parallel versions of the Black woman writer but that neither is satisfied with the category as an endpoint. Smith has spent twenty-five years testing the possibilities of the novel, essay, play, short story, and cultural criticism, while Serpell has moved with unusual ease between fiction, scholarship, criticism, and the classroom, treating each form as another instrument for examining the instability of human knowledge. Smith’s career began with the enormous public arrival of White Teeth and the strange burden of becoming a literary phenomenon in one’s twenties; Serpell’s emerged through the slower, more intellectually hybrid path of the scholar-writer whose first novel could contain nearly two centuries of Zambian history, speculative technology, family mythology, colonial inheritance, and a chorus of mosquitoes. What links them is not simply achievement but a particular faith in difficulty: the belief that a serious work of literature should be allowed to exceed the explanation we might give for it. Their books ask us to stay with contradiction long enough for contradiction to become knowledge.

Smith’s early reputation was built around exuberance, and White Teeth deserved its exuberance: the novel’s London is crowded with immigrant histories, religious commitments, family resentments, racial identities, accidents of birth, political convictions, and the comedy that erupts when people discover that the lives they have inherited are not the lives they imagined for themselves. Yet the novel’s importance becomes clearer when read backward from Smith’s later work, because what initially looked like a celebration of multicultural possibility also contained a suspicion of the stories people tell about multiculturalism. Smith has always understood that identity is both deeply felt and partially constructed, something inherited and performed, something intimate and political at the same time. Her characters frequently believe that if they can explain where they came from they will understand who they are, only to discover that history has a way of becoming more complicated once it enters the body. This is one of Smith’s great gifts: she can make sociology feel like drama without turning characters into sociological examples. Her people remain messy, funny, vain, tender, deluded, intelligent, and occasionally ridiculous, which is precisely why the larger structures around them become visible.

Right: Photography: Jack Davison – British Vogue

That gift becomes more formally daring in NW, where Smith seems to distrust the smoothness of the traditional novel as a vehicle for describing contemporary life. The fractured structures, shifts in perspective, abrupt changes in rhythm, lists, repetitions, compressed scenes, and linguistic collisions make the book feel less like a story being narrated than like a consciousness moving through a city. London becomes something more than setting: it becomes a pressure system, a geography of class and aspiration in which proximity does not necessarily produce intimacy. NW understands that people can occupy the same streets while inhabiting radically different realities, and that social mobility often produces its own peculiar forms of alienation because the person who leaves one world may never become entirely legible in another. Smith’s formal experimentation therefore has an ethical dimension; the brokenness of the narrative is not ornament but an attempt to make form answer to experience. The novel’s famous attention to speech, neighborhood, class markers, and social performance reveals Smith listening to people as carefully as she watches them. She is interested in the sentence as evidence.

That attention to language is one reason Smith’s nonfiction matters so much to an understanding of her career, because the essayist in her has always been observing the novelist at work. Changing My Mind, Feel Free, Intimations, and Dead and Alive reveal a mind that does not treat criticism as the place where a writer becomes certain, but as the place where uncertainty can be given shape. Her essays range across literature, film, politics, race, celebrity, technology, visual art, death, and the experience of being a person trying to remain intellectually awake in a culture increasingly organized around speed and spectacle. Dead and Alive, published in 2025, gathers essays concerned with artists including Toyin Ojih Odutola, Kara Walker, Celia Paul, Joan Didion, and others, while also returning repeatedly to mortality, memory, artistic inheritance, and the problem of what it means to look at another person’s work honestly. Smith’s criticism has always possessed a kind of doubleness: she is capable of admiration without surrender, and skepticism without cynicism. She does not seem interested in proving that an artist is good; she is interested in finding the precise location where the work becomes alive.

This is increasingly important in Smith’s later career because age has altered the position from which she writes. The young novelist who once had to answer questions about being a prodigy has become a writer interested in the dead, the remembered, the inherited, and the unfinished, and Dead and Alive makes that movement impossible to ignore. The collection’s title itself carries the argument: artistic life does not end neatly with biological death, because artists continue to enter the consciousness of those who read, study, imitate, resist, misunderstand, and inherit them. Smith has recently spoken about reading more women as she grows older, and that detail is revealing because it suggests that literary inheritance is not fixed at the moment we first discover ourselves as readers. We can become newly conscious of the writers who were always there but whom history, education, taste, or cultural authority taught us to overlook. The mature Smith therefore seems less interested in establishing herself as an authority than in interrogating authority itself: who granted it, who received it, who was excluded from it, and what happens when we begin reading the archive differently. Her literary life has become an argument for revision.

Namwali Serpell’s imagination begins somewhere else, in the unstable territory between literary scholarship and speculative invention, where the future is not an escape from history but one of its consequences. The Old Drift is extraordinary partly because it refuses the familiar pressure placed upon African literature to make itself immediately legible through realism, and instead gives Zambia an expansive fictional architecture capable of holding colonial history, family saga, technological speculation, satire, myth, science fiction, and grotesquerie simultaneously. The novel’s scale is not indulgence; it is an argument about what scale African history deserves. Serpell’s Zambia cannot be reduced to a political backdrop because the country itself becomes a participant in the novel’s imagination, carrying its histories forward into bodies, families, technologies, desires, and futures. Her use of the mosquito chorus is particularly telling because it destabilizes the assumption that the human being must always occupy the center of narrative consciousness. Serpell’s formal imagination keeps asking what literature might become if we changed the narrator, the scale, the chronology, or even the definition of what counts as a character.

Left to Right: Jordan Kines Photography, Nate Palmer for New York Times, Jillian Freyer for The New Yorker

That impulse is connected to Serpell’s scholarly work on uncertainty, which gives a deeper philosophical context to her fiction. Her academic book Seven Modes of Uncertainty investigates the ways literature can make uncertainty productive rather than merely frustrating, and that idea becomes almost architectural in The Old Drift and The Furrows. Serpell does not use ambiguity simply to make a reader work harder; she uses it to expose the limits of the reader’s desire for mastery. We want to know what happened, who someone really is, what a memory means, whether a strange event is supernatural or psychological, whether a future is inevitable, and whether a character’s explanation of herself can be trusted. Serpell repeatedly gives us enough information to form a theory and then introduces something that destabilizes it. This is not coyness; it is a serious theory of reading, one in which the reader’s discomfort becomes part of the encounter with the work. Uncertainty becomes an ethical position because it forces us to acknowledge how quickly we turn other people’s lives into stories we believe we understand.

The Furrows brings that philosophy into the most intimate possible territory: grief. Its central wound is the disappearance and death of Wayne, the brother of its protagonist, and the novel’s peculiar repetitions and shifts make mourning feel less like a chronological process than a distortion of time itself. The dead do not remain obediently in the past; they return through resemblance, memory, possibility, fantasy, and the unbearable imagination of what might have happened differently. Serpell understands something that sentimental literature often avoids: grief is not simply sadness but a crisis in epistemology, because the mourner knows something has happened while simultaneously experiencing the mind’s refusal to make that knowledge emotionally final. The question becomes not only who has died but how a person continues to exist inside someone else’s perception after death. Serpell’s formal choices make that contradiction visible rather than resolving it into therapeutic clarity. The result is a novel in which narrative instability becomes an accurate representation of emotional instability.

Serpell’s relationship to Toni Morrison makes this commitment to difficulty even clearer, particularly in On Morrison, her 2026 collection of essays devoted to Morrison’s novels, criticism, poetry, plays, and editorial work. Serpell’s most provocative decision is also the simplest: she refuses to make Morrison into a monument. She wants the work rather than the icon, the sentence rather than the celebrity, the craft rather than the cultural shorthand. In interviews surrounding the book, Serpell has repeatedly emphasized that Morrison’s artistry can become obscured when discussions of her are dominated by her identity and public significance, and she argues instead for the seriousness of Morrison’s aesthetic achievement. That position is particularly powerful coming from a Black woman scholar and novelist because it refuses the expectation that Black women writers should be grateful merely to be represented while their formal intelligence is treated as secondary. Serpell’s criticism insists upon something more demanding: Black writers deserve to be read as artists of enormous technical complexity.

Continue reading →

Still Here: The Age of Staying (The Archive of Love)

Posted on by

Written By: Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

Photo by Tom Falcon . John Mayer  — 2023-2024

A year arrives, creating a number demonstrating a collection of moments on Earth, and everyone makes a joke about getting older. To me, it’s more the quiet aging that occurs in front of you while a person is busy living. The gray that appears at the temples and then stays. The slight change in the face after a long night. The way the body asks for more recovery than it used to. The way sleep becomes precious. The way a person who once seemed almost indestructible begins, occasionally, to remind you that he is made of the same temporary material as everybody else.

I notice these things in John.

Of course I do.

When you love somebody, you become a student of small changes. You know the difference between tired and exhausted. You know the silence that means concentration and the silence that means something is wrong. You know when somebody needs to be alone and when they are hoping you will sit beside them without asking why. You know the look that comes over a person’s face when they are thinking about something they haven’t figured out how to say.

Sometimes I worry about him.

Not because I think something is necessarily wrong. Worry is not always a prediction. Sometimes worry is simply what love becomes when it realizes that another person’s life is precious and finite. I worry about whether he sleeps enough. I worry about how much he carries in his head. I worry about the strange burden of being a person who has spent so much of his life being watched while still needing somewhere to put the private parts of himself. I worry about what happens when the body begins asking questions that ambition cannot answer.

And I know he worries about me, too.

This is one of the things nobody tells you about marriage: eventually you become responsible for knowing the shape of another person’s fragility.

Not responsible for fixing it.

That is different.

You simply learn where it lives.

You learn which days require tenderness and which require laughter. You learn that sometimes the person you love needs to be reminded to eat, and sometimes she needs to be left alone with a book. You learn that a question can be an act of care, but too many questions can become another kind of pressure. You learn the difference because you have lived together long enough to know that love is not one behavior repeated forever.

Love is adjustment.

It is a language that keeps changing its grammar.

When we were younger, I thought love was mostly about recognition. Finding the person who understood you. Finding the person who could see through your defenses. Finding the person who made the world feel larger.

Image above: John in his youth.

Now I think love is also about witnessing.

You watch someone become.

You watch them become a parent. You watch them become more tired. You watch them become more patient in some ways and less patient in others. You watch old ambitions lose their urgency and new ones take their place. You watch the person you married discover that some of the things he thought he needed at thirty are not the things he needs now.

And if you are lucky, he watches you do the same.

There is something beautiful about watching John move more deeply into music without needing music to prove anything about him.

I don’t mean that he has stopped caring about excellence. He cares too much for that. But there is a difference between needing to demonstrate what you can do and wanting to understand what the thing itself can teach you.

I hear that difference in the way he talks now.

Continue reading →

Meshell Ndegeocello, Cat Power and the Afterlife of a Familiar Song

Posted on by

Written By: Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

The Human League’s Don’t You Want Me has lived in the public imagination for more than four decades. Its bright synthesizers, crisp electronic drums and theatrical vocal arrangement made it one of the defining pop records of the early 1980s. Meshell Ndegeocello and Cat Power do not attempt to reproduce any of that stark glitz. 

The original version is contagiously catchy. Beneath its immaculate synth-pop surface is a tense exchange between two former lovers who remember their relationship very differently. One person claims credit for the other’s transformation and success; the other refuses to remain inside that version of the story.

Ndegeocello and Chan Marshall deconstruct the jovialness of the composition, making the confrontation of the lyrical more broody, and possibly more appropriate the memory-based cross-purposes of the ex-paramour. 

Synonym due out October 2nd due out via Blue Note Records

This being the second single from Ndegeocello’s forthcoming third full-length album for Blue Note Records, Synonym, “Don’t You Want Me” moves at the pace of a late-night conversation. The synthesizers and urgency of the original give way to a deep, patient dub-reggae groove. Ndegeocello’s bass sits low within the mix, giving the song its center of gravity, while the arrangement leaves considerable space around Chan Marshall’s voice. Moreover, the arrangement is slower and heavier, with a groove that feels less like a pop single and more like something drifting out of a based-latent subwoofer after midnight. The bass is not decoration—it is the architecture. The rhythm gives Marshall space to inhabit the song rather than perform it.

Ndegeocello does not need to change the lyrics to expose the tension. She changes the temperature of the song.

Marshall and Ndegeocello alternate verses, then come together on the pre-chorus and chorus. The contrast between their voices is part of the recording’s appeal. Marshall’s delivery retains the vulnerable, slightly improvised or retro style that has long defined Cat Power, while Ndegeocello brings a steady grounding with her presence. Neither voice dominates. 

That balance, though, changes the emotional mechanics of the original. The song no longer feels like an argument that has to be won. It becomes a conversation between people who already know that the relationship has changed. The song remains recognizable, but almost everything surrounding its original identity has shifted. The tempo is different. The physical feeling is different. The gender dynamics are different. Most importantly, the emotional distance now draws you in at the center of the depth of the romantic conundrum.

This is where Ndegeocello’s approach to covers becomes particularly interesting. She is not interested in nostalgia for its own sake. Her previous covers treated well-known songs as material that could be reconsidered rather than simply reproduced. With Synonym, that instinct has become the organizing principle of the entire album. “Don’t You Want Me” makes that idea concrete along with the full body of work.

Ndegeocello’s music has always made room for those kinds of overlapping meanings. Her bass playing is melodic and physical, but her larger body of work has consistently treated music as a form of conversation—between genres, generations, political ideas and individual artists. On “Don’t You Want Me,” that conversation is molasses-quiet.

Ndegeocello is not asking what these songs sounded like when they first entered the world. She is asking what they can mean now—and what becomes possible when another artist gives them the freedom to change it.

“Don’t You Want Me” does not answer its own question.

It lets the question linger in the groove.

P / P Unpublished: Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer Reflects Family, Children, Marriage and ‘The Warmest Low’ trilogy (Full Interview)

Posted on by

Published by Publik / Private Editors

Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer reflects on time, marriage, children, songwriting, and the decade-long evolution of The Warmest Low—from 2009 recordings to a growing body of music, literature, and film. Read the edited interview via Week In Pop on July 8, 2026.

Image Above: Unpublished photo circa 2019

PREFACE

The question, as I mention in this full interview regarding the development of a new Jordannah Elizabeth (Graham-Mayer) album, was: “Who is Jordannah at 40 years old?” The people who lightly helped shape the reality and concept of the upcoming album knew I had been married three times. They knew some of my children—if not all of them—and they knew portions of my life that I’ve kept private for years.

John, whom I called “Jonny” when I was a little girl (I barely knew how to spell his name, so I asked my mom to help me write it on a party favor after quietly requesting that he be invited to my birthday party. He was older, and I had a crush on him—one I couldn’t discuss with anyone. My family was also very nosy and aggressive, so I kept a lot to myself.), and I were married 20 years ago. Later, my 14-year marriage to the musician people know as Drake came to an end, allowing John and me to decide to take another leap together—a decision that was honestly made very thoughtfully and rationally. Aubrey was incredibly respectful, mature, and supportive throughout the process.

Musically, the new album is about family and the fathers of my children. I have to confess that I’ve been ill, and they have stepped up to become the primary parents to our children. Some people know Jimmi, Buzz and Sonam. Some know Marie, Olivia, and Rosie through John’s music. Others know Adonis, my biological son with another father, named Beach, though Aubrey (Drake) is his dad for life. Some know Charlie and Shawn, who became stars, while others know the children who are simply growing up outside the public eye.

This is my reality. In some ways, I feel like I should apologize for not writing about it sooner. I didn’t choose a major publication, and we didn’t pursue a glossy magazine spread. This all came about rather spontaneously after we discussed how some people, often unfairly, have criticized John for not speaking publicly about our family. The truth is, it really isn’t anyone else’s business.

What made me realize it wasn’t intentional on his part was an interview I gave to Week in Pop, which was heavily edited. References to John, Drake, and Universal Music Group CEO Lucian Grainge were omitted. Lucian heard something in some unreleased recordings that I didn’t initially hear myself, and his encouragement ultimately helped lead to their release as part of The Warmest Low Trilogy, which includes The Warmest Low (Single One): 10th Anniversary Edition, The Warmest Low (Single Two), and Makeshivt Kity’s first release in 16 years, Experimental (Voice & Cello).

Enjoy the full interview.

There’s a lot of tea.

Image Above: Jordannah in 2026

The Warmest Low (Single Two) arrives as part of a trilogy that spans more than a decade, but also reaches back even further to recordings made in 2010. When you think about time as a collaborator in this project, how has your relationship to these songs changed between the moment they were recorded and the moment they were finally released?

The last time I spoke to you, I had released ‘Borders (Live)’ where I was sitting with my music director, Miles and we were going through songs to rework. I remembered I had an epiphany about Borders. This time, I was buying time, thinking about time and wanting to find songs that had a quality that held up to The Warmest Low (Single One). So, this time around, it wasn’t about time being a collaborator in a specific manner, it was about aligning the music with (Single One).

John and I have been having kids for the last three years, and when you’re pregnant, you need more time. You need more thought when it comes to navigating your energy levels, we were also traveling, so there was this time where we were all moving about, and I found myself trying to figure things out after the first round of development had been solidified. Who is Jordannah Elizabeth at 40 years old? This concept of family and the fathers of my kids, including Drake and a child from a third marriage, so we went to work on Fathers.  Nonetheless, before this drop, I wanted to continue my work on The Warmest Low – a chapbook series, a music series and a scripted series. I like columns, series, continuations, growth, the discipline of keeping with a project over many years, so this felt right.

The Silver Lake bungalow sessions with Marika Tjelios feel like a very specific sonic and geographic memory. What do you remember most vividly about that space in Los Angeles at the time, and how did that environment shape the emotional tone of the recordings?

My first big Makeshivt Kity release, Los Angeles EP was released in 2007, and labels were very interested. I moved out to Los Angeles from Denver, and began shopping. Things were going alright, but soon into it, I had some tragedy, and the economic crash occurred. This wasn’t the biggest issue: I went back to Colorado and released The Holy Implant, and the labels said it was too weird. A netlabel, Trastienda took me on, but I decided to turn the discouragement into fuel, met Marika and wrote three songs to create a single called Patience under the name Jordannah Elizabeth.

It was my first solo release, and I prided myself in working with a woman producer. She was brilliant and had every instrument you could think of in her house. We sat for a weekend, and the bonus song on 10th Anniversary was track 2, and on (Single Two), Patience was track 1 and ‘Just for You’ was track 3.

Silverlake and Echo Park were in a hayday, when The Warlocks, BRMC, Dead Meadow, Miranda Lee, and all sorts of bands were beyond burgeoning. I was inspired by those bands for the Holy Implant, but I think I toned it down, and really looked to Elliott Smith, Ryan Adams, Jill Scott, Miranda, the subtlety of Tess Parks and so on.

The Warmest Low series has expanded beyond music into chapbooks, essays and other literary forms, almost functioning like a living archive. When you’re moving between writing and recording within this universe, how do you decide what becomes a song versus what becomes text?

Interesting – (Single Two) was kind of organic, meaning, when I sit down with my work and begin to decide what to do and release, I know I create the single to have another collection of music. The simple logic of it is, ‘I wouldn’t call it (Single One) if there wasn’t meant to be (Single Two), so when I was settled back into the United States after teaching, and creating a bit of routine with John, Aubrey, the kids and our moms/families, it was time to cook.

John made me do it. I didn’t want to, honestly. I love how listeners really respect me, and I care for readers and listeners, but I can live without being a big star, or even dropping and being a big to-do. If I sign to a label, it will be for him, and honestly, if he didn’t release for a long time, I’d probably talk to him. He’s been out of his deal for 5+ years, so that was a combo of him ramping up a bit, re-organizing himself, and then him getting deeper into his A&R space, and saying ‘it’s time’. I resisted, but this is a fun endeavor that’s giving me time to get deep into writing, composing and recording.

John Mayer’s role as A&R and COO of The Process Records came after he and Drake initially championed your work years earlier. 

Yeah, I have to mention that Drake worked hard in the background in about 2019. We had been quietly married for a long time, but I think there was this point where he began to get things moving. He honestly inspires me to write poetry, to design and write essays. So, I ended up designing for his fashion-line and taking on his creative company as much as time permitted.

I think John is a catalyst for songwriting because Your Body is a Wonderland really changed my life as a young songwriter. I covered him when I was woodshedding, and working on my chops. His catalog is very inspiring to me as a musician. I’ve been digging into his catalog for months, and I’m excited to dig deeper, that’s not super common when it comes to long-term study. Sometimes, you have to take breaks, but I just want to learn more and study his songwriting and vocal style. When it comes to me, I have my ways, so I don’t think my album will come out sounding like him, but we’ve always noticed our similarities, particularly his folk work.

How has that long-term advocacy shaped the way you’re able to revisit and release archival material like Single Two, especially in terms of trust, sequencing, and letting older work exist on its own terms?

That was actually, Lucian Grainge. He saw something in the title track Patience, that I didn’t quite hear. I really like the song and the single, but it was there just to show I could do it outside of being a super experimental and at times, noise artist. Those songs were an F-you because I thought the labels didn’t think I had the capacity to write clean pop-folk oriented songs. Yes, he’s an exec, but I could tell his ear was genuine.

And when it comes to John, I was thinking of a Father’s Day gift, and I thought ‘Just for You’ was super sweet, and how I felt. I’d make poetry books when I was married to Drake, and it’s not a comparison, they are different people, both wonderful men, but I always want John to know I love him, and appreciate all these years. He and I have known each other since we were very young, so there’s this understanding of lost time, and this peace of knowing that time doesn’t betray you.

I always wanted him to know that the belief he had is important.

I have some old collaborators who I jammed with 20 years ago, I’m excited to work with: Qiana Glaze, and Breck Brunson (A Rush and Borders) and Miles Gannett (Borders (Live), bandleader and music director) will work on the upcoming album. I’m shooting for The Changing Colors as well, one of my fave singer/songwriter projects.

This is the story though, all that’s been happening.

P / P Poetry: I told the truth and in trouble I ended, so now I listen and smile…

Posted on by

Written by: Hektor Munoz

We are so good at fitting in
saying the right thing
nodding at the correct moment/smiling/egging on
Trained well as to be accepted, to belong and to be left alone
Fitting in/by all appearances a cookie cutter version of our peers/friends/community/ourselves
Being normal/we excel/overachieve

We are so good/affable
We learn at an early age which way our toast is buttered/we know what fork to use at dinner/how to dress for cocktails/talking about them
We learn that to be different is a big NO NO/going against the grain will leave you friendless
we know what happens to ‘those people”
Some of us know what to do about this naturally
The rest of us pick it up eventually

Once informed the party begins
some of us learn to ‘pass’
gliding in and out of a conservative world where we are not welcome, not included,
not wanted/quietly smiling as to not be noticed
the rest of us embrace our pain believing that eventually everyone will see the light/saving the children that already passed away/the many ignored/
negated/judged/hungry children
victims of endless lies/children growing up to be us/poor
proletariat parasites of ignorance refusing to fight

…and the world goes on ignoring those unfortunate disposable people
feeding us turkey legs and expired food
day old bread with plain coffee
no napkins/no forks/no bus tokens

a photo op for liberals?
material for the blog?
do we need a martyr?
where is God?

In the meantime,
I must survive…but I do not fit in, I know not what to say, when to nod, or egg on, I don’t know my place, and though I excel/overachieve, I do not belong in the cookie cutter…and that only brings “TROUBLE”…

Hektor is a Mexican poet, writer and performance artist. He currently resides in Denver, CO and is an active performer, event coordinator and curator in Denver’s bustling independent art community.

Alice Coltrane Was Never Ahead of Her Time. We Were Simply Late.

Posted on by

Written By: Jordannah Elizabeth Graham-Mayer

There is a habit in music criticism that reveals more about listeners than artists. Whenever a work feels startlingly contemporary decades after it was created, we call it ahead of its time. The phrase sounds generous, but it quietly assumes that history eventually catches genius by accident—that culture slowly grows sophisticated enough to understand what it once ignored.

Alice Coltrane deserves a different vocabulary.

The announcement that Matador Records will release the complete authorized editions of Turiya Sings, Divine Songs, Infinite Chants, and Glorious Chants is not simply another archival campaign. It is the public opening of a private musical world that was never intended to participate in the commercial rhythms of the recording industry. These recordings lived inside Sai Anantam Ashram, shared among devotees on cassettes that functioned less like albums than spiritual companions. For decades, they existed outside the mechanisms that usually produce canon: radio, charts, playlists, magazine covers, and endless retrospective rankings.

That absence matters.

Much has been written about Alice Coltrane as widow, collaborator, harpist, pianist, composer, yogini, guru, or spiritual jazz pioneer. Every description is accurate. None is sufficient. They tend to organize her life into chapters, as though one identity replaced another. The Ashram recordings refuse that narrative. They reveal continuity rather than transformation. The ecstatic searching of Journey in Satchidananda never disappeared; it simply became quieter, more devotional, less interested in performance than practice.

Listening now, one is struck by how little these recordings resemble the historical moment that produced them. Popular music in the 1980s increasingly celebrated digital perfection, commercial immediacy, and spectacle. Alice Coltrane was occupied with something entirely different. Her synthesizers do not announce technological progress. They dissolve into drones. Her voice is neither theatrical nor virtuosic. It is communal, repetitive, intentionally without ego. The songs ask listeners not to admire the performer but to surrender alongside her.

That may explain why these recordings feel unexpectedly contemporary.

In an era increasingly fascinated by ambient music, meditation playlists, healing frequencies, and music designed for attention rather than distraction, audiences have finally developed ears for work that Alice Coltrane completed decades ago. Yet reducing these recordings to wellness music would flatten their ambition. They are not sonic décor. They are acts of devotion. Their purpose is not relaxation but transcendence.

Continue reading →